RE: Torrent tests

From: Daniel Lee <dlee_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:15:15 -0700

Here is the correct sheet.

 

________________________________

From: Daniel Lee
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:06 PM
To: Ben Ebert; torrents
Subject: RE: Torrent tests

 

Here are the results for our tests on the Fox scrape sites.
Newtorrents.info, Torrentini.com, and TorrentMatrix had very little
supply (1-2 real files). Please see the attached sheet for more
details.

 

TOP 15 ATTEMPTED

 

 

 

Bittorrent.am

13%

FlixFlux

27%

Monova

40%

NewTorrents

0%

SpyNova

0%

Torrentini

0%

TorrentMatrix

0%

TorrentValley

7%

TorrentView

20%

Yotoshi

100%

 

 

________________________________

From: Ben Ebert
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:17 PM
To: qateam
Subject: Torrent tests

 

I need QA to check our effectiveness on the following scrape sites.
They are on the list Fox sent us, we should have a presence on all of
these sites without further posting but we need to make sure we're
effective and figure out how to become effective on any site we are not.

 

Bittorrent.am

FlixFlux.co.uk

NEWTorrents.info

Spynova.com <- private uploads, we should be 0% effective here but it
would be interesting if they posted one of our partial decoys.

Torrent View.com

Torrentini.com

Yotoshi.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition the following sites are postable so the BT team will be
posting this weekend and I will need a test on them soon, I will let you
know when the team is ready on these 3

Monova.org

Torrentmatrix.com

TorrentValley.com

 

Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:56:51 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:49 BST