RE: Soulseek test

From: Tabish Hasan <tabish_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:46:26 -0700

It's basically not hitting as consistently as we used to see. We'll
probably want to add more resources to it?

 

________________________________

From: Jonathan Perez
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:42 PM
To: Dylan Douglas; Tabish Hasan; Jay Mairs
Cc: qateam; Ben Grodsky
Subject: RE: Soulseek test

 

Ran some more tests today and here is what we look like. Seems I am
still getting a few real users in there. Although Gwen had no reals
this time and failed last time. The quality of the results seems to
vary between searches, possibly a problem with getting consistent
results. Below is a picture of another search I just ran on Fergie
which shows much better results.

 

String

Reals

Akon Smack That

5

Gwen Stefani wind it up

0

Fergie Glamorous

11

Nelly Furtado Say It Right

9

Beyonce Irreplaceable

3

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dylan Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:08 PM
To: Jonathan Perez; Tabish Hasan; Jay Mairs
Cc: qateam; Ben Grodsky
Subject: RE: Soulseek test

 

Can you guys check again today?

 

>-----Original Message-----

>From: Jonathan Perez

>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 6:15 PM

>To: Dylan Douglas; Tabish Hasan; Jay Mairs

>Cc: qateam; Ben Grodsky

>Subject: RE: Soulseek test

>

>We are showing up in good numbers. However, I see that real

>users are coming in at the top and a few spread around within

>the top 45.

>

>I did three tests on different servers and ran them for about an hour:

>Gym Class Heroes Cupid's Chokehold - 0 real

>Akon Smack that - 8 real

>Gwen Stefani wind it up - 7 real

>

>-Jonathan

>

>-----Original Message-----

>From: Dylan Douglas

>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:27 PM

>To: Tabish Hasan; Jay Mairs

>Cc: qateam; Ben Grodsky

>Subject: RE: Soulseek test

>

>Can you guys check soulseek again and see if I got it up and

>running? Or it needs more work.

>

>-D

>

>>-----Original Message-----

>>From: Tabish Hasan

>>Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 5:45 PM

>>To: Dylan Douglas; Jay Mairs

>>Cc: qateam; Ben Grodsky

>>Subject: RE: Soulseek test

>>

>>Just FYI, UMG/AM have started testing us on Soulseek. Luckily,

>>they were all "not enough results"...but we'll want to get

>>protection up soon.

>>

>>

>>-----Original Message-----

>>From: Jonathan Perez

>>Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:01 PM

>>To: Dylan Douglas

>>Cc: qateam

>>Subject: RE: Soulseek test

>>

>>It is not hitting for me. I tried two projects and I see real users.

>>

>>-Jonathan

>>

>>-----Original Message-----

>>From: Dylan C Douglas [mailto:dylan_at_mediadefender.com]

>>Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:56 AM

>>To: qateam

>>Subject: Soulseek test

>>

>>Please do a quick test for soulseek and see if it is back up

>>to strength.

>>

>>-D

>>

>>-----

>>Dylan Douglas

>>MediaDefender

>>

>

image001.gif
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:56:51 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:49 BST