Re: Ares results: UMG PM1

From: Ben Grodsky <grodsky_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:50:41 -0700

Cool. I knew we'd gone over it, but plum forgot.

Thanks,
Ben


----- Original Message -----
From: Ty Heath <ty.heath_at_gmail.com>
To: Ben Grodsky
Cc: Tabish Hasan; Jay Mairs
Sent: Wed Apr 18 18:47:49 2007
Subject: Re: Ares results: UMG PM1

New motherboards for those servers. We are in the process of ordering a couple and testing to make sure that fixes the problem.

Ty

On Apr 18, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Ben Grodsky wrote:


        Ty,
        
        What's the hold-up for the remaing 4 cabinets to Solaris? I forget.
        
        -Ben
        
        
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Tabish Hasan
        To: Ty Heath
        Cc: Jay Mairs; Randy Saaf; Ben Grodsky; qateam
        Sent: Wed Apr 18 17:26:40 2007
        Subject: Ares results: UMG PM1
        
        Ty,
        
        
        
        Just wanted to share how we’re looking on Ares for UMG PM1 with the 9 cabinets we have up. Overall, it looks pretty good, with a few close fails sometimes.
        
        
        
        (Data is attached. It includes tests from 4/13 to today. The grayed out results means not enough results).
        
        
        
        -TH
        
        


Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:56:07 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:48 BST