RE: really...harvard law???

From: Ben Grodsky <>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:16:24 -0700

hahaha! definitely a weak article.
the best argument against miivi is one for invasion of privacy and trespass to chattels (doing stuff intentionally to another's property). that would be based on the rumor that we scanner people's harddrives.
entrapment isn't possible, as we're not a law enforcement agency or working as agents for a law enforcement agency.


From: Randy Saaf
Sent: Tue 10-Jul-07 11:11
To: Jay Mairs; Ben Grodsky
Subject: really...harvard law???


Some douche going to Harvard law has the time to "analyze" our miivi case. Haha.

Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:57 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:46 BST