Re: Paramount torrent summary / Auto-interdiction test

From: Jed Levin <jed_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 10:42:41 -0700

A bit of a follow-up.
It seems that I've been banned from isohunt and piratebay on most of my
IPs. I'm not sure how long this will last, so we get to wait and find
out. However, most of the weekend, this wasn't the case, so it
shouldn't matter for this test. As far as IsoHunt and shooter (in
particular), the 5 that are auto-interdiction inactive (based on a
recent manual search of the website) are being filtered out by the
filters (i.e. have < 2 seeds or peers or > 1000 seeds or peers, or no
recent info on seed/peer counts). If you'd like me to raise/lower the
limits, then the remaining torrents for this particular example may be
included. At the current limits, auto-interdiction is contributing
approximately 260 unique torrents to the system (including those for Hot
Fuzz), and is not reaching the limit of 1000 torrents total, so that
should not be an issue. As far as why auto-interdiction may be
currently missing some torrents, I believe the limits are responsible.
Let me know if you'd like to change the limits any to account for this.
---Jed---

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 16:28 -0700, Tabish Hasan wrote:
> Here’s how we’re doing for Paramount. Fairly low numbers across the
> board.
>
>
>
> Of importance is to see how many interdiction-inactive torrents there
> are for each site. Each tab on the attached sheet has a column to show
> how many inactive torrents there still are. For example, Isohunt still
> has 5 inactive torrents out of the top 10 for “Shooter”. So the
> auto-interdiction system is not catching all of the torrents.
> Ebert/Jed, please take a closer look at why.
>
>
>
> -TH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TOP
> 10
> ATTEMPTED
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Project Title
>
>
> Effectiveness
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bitenova
>
>
> Btmon
>
>
> BushTorrent
>
>
> Fenopy
>
>
> IsoHunt
>
>
> MegaNova
>
>
> TorrentBox
>
>
> TorrentPortal
>
>
> TorrentReactor
>
>
> TorrentSpy
>
>
> Project Average
>
>
> Disturbia
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> N/A
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 16%
>
>
> Freedom Writers
>
>
> 30%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 30%
>
>
> 25%
>
>
> 90%
>
>
> 70%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 29%
>
>
> Shooter
>
>
> 70%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 100%
>
>
> 100%
>
>
> 90%
>
>
> 50%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 35%
>
>
>
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 7%
>
>
> 7%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 57%
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 73%
>
>
> 53%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TOP
> 15
> ATTEMPTED
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Project Title
>
>
> Effectiveness
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bitenova
>
>
> Btmon
>
>
> BushTorrent
>
>
> Fenopy
>
>
> IsoHunt
>
>
> MegaNova
>
>
> TorrentBox
>
>
> TorrentPortal
>
>
> TorrentReactor
>
>
> TorrentSpy
>
>
> Project Average
>
>
> Disturbia
>
>
> 13%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 27%
>
>
> N/A
>
>
> 27%
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 12%
>
>
> Freedom Writers
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 13%
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 20%
>
>
> 25%
>
>
> 93%
>
>
> 67%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 26%
>
>
> Shooter
>
>
> 53%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 100%
>
>
> 100%
>
>
> 87%
>
>
> 53%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 33%
>
>
> Site
> Average:
>
>
> 29%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 4%
>
>
> 5%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
> 49%
>
>
> 40%
>
>
> 69%
>
>
> 53%
>
>
> 0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:56 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:46 BST