Re: eMule

From: Ben Grodsky <grodsky_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:50:18 -0700

Dylan,

I asked and haven't gotten a response yet. I'll ask again and then escalate.

-Ben


----- Original Message -----
From: Dylan Douglas
To: Ben Grodsky (grodsky_at_mediadefender.com)
Cc: Daniel Lee; Jasper Paloyo; qa
Sent: Tue Aug 21 10:36:05 2007
Subject: RE: eMule

Grodsky,

were you going to try to get the .met files from them? Any E.T.A. on them sending them?

-D

-----
Dylan Douglas
MediaDefender
"dyed-in-the-wool online scalp hunter"
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel Lee
>Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:31 AM
>To: Jasper Paloyo; qa
>Subject: RE: eMule
>
>We did poorly on their latest eMule tests because they ran all
>of their tests off of one server: BiG BanG 10 - 80.239.200.109:3000.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jasper Paloyo
>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:15 AM
>To: qa
>Subject: FW: eMule
>Importance: High
>
>QA,
>
>How's our effectiveness on emule? Read below please.
>
>Thank You
>Jasper Paloyo
>Account Manager
>MediaDefender Inc.
>(310)-956-3362
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dong.Jang_at_sonybmg.com [mailto:Dong.Jang_at_sonybmg.com]
>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:08 AM
>To: Jasper Paloyo
>Cc: Ben Grodsky; John.McGrew_at_sonybmg.com
>Subject: eMule
>Importance: High
>
>Hi Jasper,
>
>Please take a look at your eMule service. Our reports lately
>have shown
>that you guys have slipped in effectiveness quite dramatically. Please
>resolve immediately.
>
>Thanks,
>Dong
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:56 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:46 BST