Re: utorrent

From: Ty Heath <heath_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:58:33 -0700

It'll take some time for me to answer that, but I'm looking into it.

Ty

On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Randy Saaf wrote:

> Ty
>
> Are there any new exploits with this utorrent dna junk?
>
> R
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel Lee
> To: Ben Grodsky; qa
> Cc: Ben Ebert; Benny Mao
> Sent: Fri Aug 10 16:18:28 2007
> Subject: RE: utorrent
>
> The Bittorrent client is almost identical to uTorrent 1.7. Both
> our interdiction as well as MediaSentry's still works on Bittorrent
> 6.0. We were having some problems getting our interdiction to show
> up on our local machines, but with Ty's help we figured out that
> the problem was due to port conflict and firewall issues.
>
> The only difference between uTorrent and Bittorrent was that the
> Bittorrent client came with an additional app called "Bittorrent
> DNA" (Delivery Network Accelerator), which acts as a local proxy.
> Overall, we saw similar speeds/performance on both clients.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Ben Grodsky
> Sent: Fri 8/10/2007 9:25 AM
> To: qa
> Cc: Ben Ebert; Benny Mao
> Subject: FW: utorrent
>
>
> QA,
>
> Is there anything we should be concerned about here or anything
> interest of note?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Randy Saaf
> Sent: Tue 07-Aug-07 23:16
> To: torrents; leaks
> Subject: utorrent
>
>
> There is a new version of utorrent. It seems like they added a lot
> of new features. maybe even a server component
>
> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8948/%C2%B5Torrent+Relaunched+as
> +BitTorrent+6.0+Beta
>
>
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:54 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:46 BST