RE: Dead Torrents

From: Tabish Hasan <tabish_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:02:24 -0700

I thought about it some more....

We can just do a similar check on our dead torrents...but reversed. We
would check every set amount of time...for any seed/peer #'s. If they
report #'s, then we would move them back into the protection_enabled
section.

 

-TH

 

________________________________

From: Tabish Hasan
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Ivan Kwok; Ben Ebert; Jay Mairs
Cc: Ty Heath; Ben Grodsky; Randy Saaf; qateam
Subject: FW: Dead Torrents

 

Ivan,

 

Regarding our dead torrent process, it seems like we're still removing
many torrents with high seed/peer #s. On the attached sheet, you'll
notice that out of 20 randomly picked "dead" torrents...several (like 6)
of them are very much alive and would download w/in 2 hours.

 

Any ideas of what can we do to decrease the false positives we remove
from our system? I don't know why it's labeling this many as dead
considering we now wait 48 hours.

 

-TH

________________________________

From: Daniel Lee
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:53 PM
To: Tabish Hasan
Cc: Jonathan Perez
Subject: Dead Torrents

 

Here's the uTorrent raw data for the dead torrents I downloaded.
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:53 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:46 BST