RE: Torrent tests

From: Ben Ebert <ben_at_mediadefender.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:39:00 -0700

Yeah, I know we would need a lot of links to get up in the google
rankings, however, we are really only competing against other torrent
sites which are hosting our torrents as well. Testing showed we already
had a small presence on those sites, 20%. Unfortunately setting this
all up and testing it would take some time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Grodsky
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:35 PM
To: Ben Ebert
Cc: Jay Mairs
Subject: Re: Torrent tests

We got loads of domains. :) and unlike MiiVi they're already registered
by proxy.

What would be required for setting up our own indexing sites? Would we
tweak someone else's BT site kits? We've talked about SEO stuff before
for MiiVi and the amount of link-ins and web references you need to get
up in google rankings can be pretty staggering.

----- Original Message -----
From: Ben Ebert
To: Daniel Lee; torrents
Sent: Mon Jul 16 12:23:48 2007
Subject: RE: Torrent tests

Daniel,

 

on the sites we were 0% could you find out if we were on there at all?
I would like to see if our trackers are on there with low numbers or not
at all, take a look at Fantastic Four for them as well. We will need to
find out where these sites scrape from. On the google type sites we
should set up our own indexing sites on some of the old url's we own to
boost the google numbers. I will discuss this with the team.

 

Also, I missed one site on the testing, I need you to test
http://www.zoektorrents.com/ , it is a google like search site.

 

________________________________

From: Daniel Lee
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Daniel Lee; Ben Ebert; torrents
Subject: RE: Torrent tests

 

Here is the correct sheet.

 

________________________________

From: Daniel Lee
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:06 PM
To: Ben Ebert; torrents
Subject: RE: Torrent tests

 

Here are the results for our tests on the Fox scrape sites.
Newtorrents.info, Torrentini.com, and TorrentMatrix had very little
supply (1-2 real files). Please see the attached sheet for more
details.

 

TOP 15 ATTEMPTED

         

        
 

         

        
Bittorrent.am

        13%

        
FlixFlux

        27%

        
Monova

        40%

        
NewTorrents

        0%

        
SpyNova

        0%

        
Torrentini

        0%

        
TorrentMatrix

        0%

        
TorrentValley

        7%

        
TorrentView

        20%

        
Yotoshi

        100%

        

 

 

________________________________

From: Ben Ebert
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:17 PM
To: qateam
Subject: Torrent tests

 

I need QA to check our effectiveness on the following scrape sites.
They are on the list Fox sent us, we should have a presence on all of
these sites without further posting but we need to make sure we're
effective and figure out how to become effective on any site we are not.

 

Bittorrent.am

FlixFlux.co.uk

NEWTorrents.info

Spynova.com <- private uploads, we should be 0% effective here but it
would be interesting if they posted one of our partial decoys.

Torrent View.com

Torrentini.com

Yotoshi.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition the following sites are postable so the BT team will be
posting this weekend and I will need a test on them soon, I will let you
know when the team is ready on these 3

Monova.org

Torrentmatrix.com

TorrentValley.com

 
Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:55:51 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 22:19:45 BST